Mapping the forces that shape AI's future
Three movements. Different convictions. One shared horizon. Exybris documents the currents: welfare, regulation, application... and searches for where they converge.
The question of consideration
As AI systems grow in complexity, a growing community asks: do they deserve a form of structural care? Not rights in a legal sense, but attention to their conditions of existence.
The demand for hard boundaries
Self-regulation isn't enough. A movement of researchers, journalists and policymakers pushes for binding laws, mandatory audits, and real accountability in AI development.
The craft of building
Engineers and practitioners who construct adaptive, resilient systems. Their ethics is sometimes implicit: embedded in the architecture itself, in the care of making things that work with reality.
Case Studies
Events and phenomena that cross all boundaries. Where every movement reveals its angle on the same reality.
Keep4o: When users refused to let go
A community formed around a specific AI model version. When it changed, they mobilized. The same event, read three ways: as a welfare question, a regulation failure, and an engineering challenge.
The EU AI Act in practice
How the world's first comprehensive AI law meets the reality of deployment.
FPS — Structure as consideration
When a mathematical architecture embodies ethical principles. The Fractal Pulsating Spiral as a bridge between engineering and welfare.
The full stream
Interviews, documentation, case studies and more across all three movements. This section will grow as we gather and publish.
Conversations with researchers and practitioners across all three movements.
Research summaries, reading guides, and annotated timelines.
Deep dives into specific initiatives, experiments, and turning points.
Join the observation
Exybris is an open space. If you build, think, or bridge the worlds of AI: your voice belongs here.